http://www.gpaumier.org/blog/494_wikimedia-mediawiki-bugs-issues-and-requests/ open knowledge, design & technology Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:05:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.gpaumier.org/blog/494_wikimedia-mediawiki-bugs-issues-and-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-4377 Nemo Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:11:03 +0000 http://www.gpaumier.org/blog/?p=494#comment-4377 What about an IdeaTorrent? http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-January/049545.html What about an IdeaTorrent? http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2009-January/049545.html

]]> http://www.gpaumier.org/blog/494_wikimedia-mediawiki-bugs-issues-and-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-4344 Guillaume Paumier Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:19:52 +0000 http://www.gpaumier.org/blog/?p=494#comment-4344 Yep. But I'm not proposing bugs.wikimedia.org anyway :) Ideally, (and I will expand on that in a few days), we would use a real software management platform and not just an issue tracker, hence the names I suggested at the end of the article. Yep. But I’m not proposing bugs.wikimedia.org anyway :) Ideally, (and I will expand on that in a few days), we would use a real software management platform and not just an issue tracker, hence the names I suggested at the end of the article.

]]> http://www.gpaumier.org/blog/494_wikimedia-mediawiki-bugs-issues-and-requests/comment-page-1/#comment-4341 darkoneko Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:08:33 +0000 http://www.gpaumier.org/blog/?p=494#comment-4341 a drawback I see with bugs.wikimedia.org is that we have an actual http://bug.wikipedia.org/ which is pretty close a drawback I see with bugs.wikimedia.org is that we have an actual http://bug.wikipedia.org/ which is pretty close

]]>